January 11, 2014

Face to Face With Self in the Sky

Filed under: The Healing Project — Ann @ 5:34 pm
She Flies Through the Air

She Flies Through the Air

Today, on a misty mountaintop in Sonoma, high above the oaks and madrone, I flew. As in, I was on a platform thirty feet up in the air, my instructor said, “Hep!” and I, holding on to the bar, went sailing down, down, down, then swung back up, up, up, the wind blowing fresh against my chilled cheeks and enhancing the feeling of SHIMMERINGLY ALIVE like I’ve never felt before. On the way down I let out a terrified holler; sailing back it modulated to an exhilarated cry of joy. Someone on the ground yelled out delightedly, “Oh good, we have a screamer!” and the (much-more experienced) students below me laughed good-naturedly. Today I flew, and the entire experience was life-changing.

A few weeks ago my friend Kim, who’s been taking lessons for several years, invited me to go to trapeze school with her. Always up for a good death-defying experience, I said yes. I had no idea what I was in for. The first part of this morning’s training involved standing on a thick gym mat, bending my knees, and then jumping to try to reach a small trapeze bar above me. When I couldn’t reach it, my instructor added a wobbly wooden box and, standing on that, I leaped for the bar and held on for dear life, my arm muscles begging for mercy. He then told me to swing my butt up, wrap my legs around the bar, and hang upside down, and he wasn’t kidding. I did that, but at this point started wondering, “How am I going to do this….thirty feet up in the air?” The terror set in.

My instructors, M and D, were brilliant. M especially, who was working with me one-on-one, immediately assessed the various head trips I was laying on myself. He assured me that I was in fact strong enough to do this (“it’s not about strength, it’s about timing”) and — intuiting my body-worries or perhaps overhearing me tell another student that I needed to run home, lose 50 pounds, and come back — he assured me that they’d had people weighing 400 pounds successfully do trapeze. And, when I first tried to do the knee-hang thing while on the actual trapeze and didn’t quite make it and yelled out, “I can’t!”, he had a little pep talk with me afterwards about “the greatest self-help book ever written — The Little Engine That Could. And he was so right that the cliche didn’t even annoy me.

He said something else, too. He said, “We don’t get in shape in order to have fun….we have fun doing this and the getting in shape happens on its own.”

Trapeze challenges your brain’s every notion of your physical orientation to the planet below. Your brain does not WANT you to jump from a 30-foot platform into the void, and it most certainly does not want you to then roll your hind end up towards the sky, maneuver your legs over a bar and view the world from a pendulating upside-down perch. So many times today my brain was yelling, “No! No! No! No! No!” but the part of me that wants to push myself, challenge my body, and drink up every drop of life then smack my lips from the delirious intoxicating pleasure, kept going. Kept climbing that high, narrow, ladder. Kept standing on that platform with my toes at the very edge, hanging on to that bar and leaning perilously forward at a crazy-ass angle to the ground, kept leaping and flying…climbing, leaping, flying…climbing, leaping, flying.

I can’t wait to get back. I need to master the swing-by-the-knees maneuver. And then the “catch,” where I fling myself into the waiting hands of my instructor. And after that: higher, faster, stronger. Because today, my body, my brain, and I had a lovely reconciliation, and there will be no more talk of “I can’t.” I can. I did! And I will.

December 25, 2013

Paths and shortcuts and childhood

Filed under: Uncategorized — Ann @ 3:05 pm
Kid streets

Kid streets

The Bay Area is on something like its 18th spare-the-air day this season, when we’re asked to limit driving and forgo fireplace blazes. So, having a kale emergency and needing to go to the store, I invited Neal to walk to Safeway with me, leaving the Saturn in the driveway. A little way into the walk he said, “I know a shortcut.” He and I have lived here almost 20 years and I’ve never heard of such a shortcut but I was game. As we ditched off the sidewalk near the hospital and headed behind Sassarini school towards an actual dirt path banked by dormant blackberry bushes, I turned to him and remarked, “This is bold.” For while there are lots of “shortcuts” in Sonoma that involve cutting through a building’s breezeways or taking concrete paths like the one adjacent to the Sonoma Valley Inn, this is the first time in a long time I’d seen an actual kid-shortcut: it was genuine dirt, it ran behind buildings, and it truly shaved about half the time off our trip. I was impressed.

So as we walked we got to talking about shortcuts. I told him, “You know, when I was growing up in Pinole there were tons of these. As kids, we rarely walked on the sidewalk. We walked across cow pastures, next to the creek, on long paths behind neighbors’ fences, and we even made dirt paths in the bushes up above the street proper, so we could walk among grasses and weeds and poison oak.” He said that in Pleasant Hill, it was much the same way. When I was 13 they sent us to a crummy junior high school in El Sobrante and whenever I chose to walk instead of take the scary smelly bus with the scarier school-bus driver (who was actually drunk one day and sideswiped every car on Allview Avenue), I would head for the cow pasture at Appian Way and never touch concrete again until arriving at the school’s main gate. We knew all the shortcuts.

These well-traveled paths of my youth in Pinole are mostly if not entirely gone, what with in-fill and the jumble of big-box stores that replaced all of the open fields.

And I really have no point to make here except that, while the good old days weren’t always that good, dirt shortcuts were in fact very good. Discovering there’s one right here in Sonoma was the best part of today.

September 15, 2013

What I’ve Learned About Posting on Facebook

Filed under: MiscellAnnia,Rants! — Ann @ 11:07 am

Just a thought

When I first started using Facebook, I was the worst. Giddy with newcomer’s joy and accustomed to the relative “privacy” of the Faire yahoogroups community to which I’d been posting for years, I chatted about personal problems, talked about financial woes, delved into health issues (facepalm), and posted game apps like they were horserace scores. I was out of control. I confess, it’s taken me longer than it should have to get even a little bit Facebook savvy — and still sometimes I slip.

With that said, here are tidbits I’ve gleaned as to what makes a good post on Facebook. These are lessons I’ve learned; your mileage may vary. In other words, I’m not trying to tell you what to do or how to post. Okay, maybe I am, just a little. And there’s the thing: Even though I know better, I’m still guilty of violating my own guidelines at times. But I’m better than I used to be. And I haven’t posted a cat photo in days.

1. Keep posts brief. Long narratives are okay sometimes, if there’s a payoff, but otherwise get a blog.

2. Be entertaining, if possible. Not everyone has the comedic skills of Steve Martin or the writing skills of Stephen King, but do strive to bring a smile.

3. But don’t try too hard. This comes off on Facebook as, well, desperate.

4. Try not to post your Scrabble Bingos or other point scores reached on games. Even those who love you more than life itself really don’t care. Really.

5. You get to post one Petition per year. Choose wisely.

6. Unless you have a very “interesting” group of friends, know that if you routinely post cat photos and videos, the audience for those will be very small.

7. Life vignettes of the “you’ll never believe what happened to me!” variety are great. Refer to guidelines in #1 and #2 above.

8. As in Real Life, politics and religion are dicey. Understand that you may be starting something you didn’t want to start, and you’re not going to change anyone’s mind. But if your inner activist is nevertheless called to Facebook, preach away, children. However, the caution of #6 applies here.

9. You don’t really need to be warned about ads or spam, right? Or personal posts about money, health, personal relationships, your job, your boss, etc.? Sometimes people like to post in ways that bring them support for their troubles; who am I to scold? Just tread carefully in these very choppy, very dark waters.

10. Sharing articles that move, inspire, inform and blow the socks right off is wonderful – probably not very many Friends will read them, however.

11. Try to be positive. In general, posting hair-raising news of the day for no good reason (and, arguably, Amber Alerts may be a good reason) isn’t really Facebook-Friendly. Other good reasons include important updates about encroaching fires and horrible traffic jams. A good rule of thumb is the old “before you speak, THINK: is it True, Helpful, Inspiring, Necessary, Kind’?

12. No guilt-tripping. “Like and Post This On Your Status for One Hour or You Hate Jesus and a Puppy Will be Drowned” is no fair. Not all of us like to re-post.

13. A personal request: please no photos of Gruesome Things. I don’t want to have to scroll past you.

14. Funny always wins. Not necessarily Insulting Funny, but funny in the way that hilarious kid in 11th grade was, always making people laugh effortlessly and easily. Fortunately, I have several Friends who are like this and their posts are pure gold.

And, finally:

15. Snopes. Snopes. Snopes. Please God, Snopes.

August 18, 2013

Do you get it yet? You have to stop smoking, now.

Filed under: Rants! — Tags: , , , , , , , — Ann @ 10:20 am

This says it all.

I lost a friend to lung cancer last week. In the 1980s, she was my director for a number of community theatre musicals. On March 18th of this year I received an email from her through that theatre’s Yahoogroups list, thanking all of us for birthday wishes and signed, “Love to all!” It’s five months later, and she’s dead. A vibrant, life-loving woman in her 70s, gone.

Maybe people in their 20s, 30s and 40s (according to Gallup, the largest group of smokers) think that when they’re older they won’t treasure life as much. How can we make young smokers understand that, at 75, they will want to live active, energetic lives just as passionately as they do now? Maybe that cognitive leap isn’t possible. Tobacco companies are banking on that inability to see as a 20-something just how desperately you will cling to life as an elder — and just how worthwhile life will be.

When I heard what my friend had died of, I Googled “what is it like to die of lung cancer?” and read an About.com article with growing horror. Nonstop coughing, gasping for breath, increasing weakness, decreased appetite and weight loss, confusion and, of course this: “It’s very likely that you will experience pain in your final stages of lung cancer.” Severe pain, as the cancer spreads to your chest and spine bones. If you smoke, think of someone you love very much experiencing those symptoms. Unbearable, right? Please love yourself enough not to want the same for you.

And, by the way, I’m not just, well…blowing smoke. I get that puffing can be awesome and quitting can be hell. I was a pack-a-day smoker for 20 years before quitting cold turkey at age 35. I was motivated by an article I’d read about a little girl with cystic fibrosis whose mother had to dangle her upside down and whack her back several times daily to clear her chest so the girl could breathe. I thought, “That little girl would give anything to have healthy lungs, and I’m voluntarily harming mine.” I quit the next morning.

If you want stop-smoking tips, message me. I will help.

August 9, 2013

All about liminal stages

Filed under: Sacred Wilderness — Ann @ 11:01 am

In the musical “Gypsy,” the newbie stripper is advised by her seasoned colleagues that she has to specialize, has to claim a niche — or, in their words, “You Gotta Have a Gimmick.” And this is true for all professionals. Everyone specializes these days and generalists get lost. I’ve been pondering for some time what I want to specialize in when it comes to my counseling work. For over a year I’ve counseled trauma survivors and that’s one area I can call mine. In my new job, I’m working essentially as a “life coach” to those who are starting over from homelessness. I’ve been thinking about what these jobs have in common, and the big draw for me. And I realize that they both activate my long, long fascination with life transitions, and what I like to call “liminal” or in-between states. This morning, for the first time, I researched the background of the term “liminal states.” I learned that a liminal stage is an anthropological term (“limin” means “threshold”), and it’s a stage of a ritual. Specifically, it’s that state of ambiguity or disorientation that happens in the middle stage of rituals, when those involved are no longer their pre-ritual selves, but not yet their transformed selves. During a ritual’s “liminal” stage, participants are standing at the threshold between their previous way of structuring their identity, time, or community, and their new way of life. They are no longer who they were when they began the ritual, nor are they the person they will be when they emerge from the ritual. And thus my specialty area was born. I plan to do therapy with individuals, couples and families in liminal states, in very specific places of transition. This could be adolescents emerging into adulthood, couples planning marriage (or divorce); those starting or finishing school, or jobs, moving, experiencing midlife changes; in recovery from substance abuse, grieving — any and all transition work. Transition counseling isn’t new, but transition counseling grounded in ritual/stage work is very specialized. We don’t have enough rituals in our culture; my transformative counseling work will focus on ways we need to acknowledge, grieve and/or celebrate change through ritual. So excited!

July 24, 2013

Kate Middleton and The Bump Seen ‘Round the World

She could have hidden this. Her choice speaks volumes - courageous volumes.

I’m not much of a Royals Watcher. Frankly, I don’t understand a lot of the fuss, but I acknowledge that millions of Americans derive pleasure from tuning in to palace happenings, especially the ones which feature plenty of pomp, horse-drawn carriages, and elegantly-uniformed heralds making “hear ye” proclamations. I didn’t pay much attention to the fairy-tale rise and tragic death of Diana Spencer and I haven’t been paying much attention to the next generation: William and Kate, their wedding, her subsequent pregnancy or, most recently, the birth of their baby. (I just had to double-check the name of her husband because I wasn’t sure which of Diana’s kids he was. That’s how out of the loop I’ve been.)

But something happened yesterday that made me sit straight up and take notice of this woman named Kate Middleton. Tom Sykes of The Royalist summed it up nicely:

“As [she] stood proudly on the steps of the Lindo Wing yesterday with her new baby, she chose to wear a cornflower blue polka dot dress – remarkably similar to the one William’s mother, Diana had worn when she appeared from the same hospital carrying her first son. But whereas Diana had stepped out of the hospital in a dress that would have been more use on a camping trip than at a cocktail party – a huge, figure-shrouding gown that hid her post-pregnancy body – Kate…emerged in a light Jenny Packham dress…with a gathered empire waist that actually belted above her tummy, making no effort to hide her changed body shape. This thoroughly modern royal was apparently determined to lend a helping hand to women everywhere who have just give birth, and shatter one of the last taboos of pregnancy – the post-baby belly.”

In response to the photos of Kate with a prominent belly bulge, I’ve read comments from people wondering why she still “looks pregnant” and wondering whether something was amiss. Because, unfortunately, many of the models we have in the States for post-pregnancy body shapes come directly from Hollywood/celebrity culture which would have us believe that a woman who is too thin to throw a shadow when she conceives will be just as pencil-slender the day after labor and delivery. If memory serves, People has historically devoted large chunks of their shiny fantasy-mag to articles (with photos) that boast how quickly so-and-so got her body back post-baby. In America, this is the gold standard of motherhood — to very quickly look like you are NOT in fact a mother and get back to your sexy, sexy self the minute the cord is cut. What baby?

How powerful was Kate’s choice to be seen in all of her post-delivery glory? In the same Royalist article, Siobhan Freegard said that “In a couple of minutes on the steps of the Lindo Wing, Kate has done more for new mums’ self esteem than any other role model.
 Sadly too many celebrities often have ultra fast tummy tucks or strap themselves down to emerge in tiny size 6 jeans, leaving everyone else feeling inadequate. Kate shows what a real mum looks like – and natural is beautiful.
”

Kate could have done any number of things to hide the fact that she still looks six months pregnant (which is normal, and known by every new mother trying to squeeze into the same clothes she wore to the hospital for the trip home). She could have gone the Diana route and lost herself in a tent dress. She could have girdled it up and dressed it down to minimize it as much as possible. She could have refused to be photographed until after she was seated in the car. She could have held the car seat/baby in front of her. She could have chosen to cast and maintain an illusion of perfection. Instead, she chose to show the realities of childbirth and demonstrate the truth that even duchesses who live in palaces have real post-baby bodies, bulges and all. That’s confidence — utter, complete, this-is-what-I-look-like confidence. And nothing makes a woman more beautiful and interesting than confidence.

It’s also incredibly positive and powerful role-modeling for women everywhere. Kate Middleton, I’m going to be paying a lot more attention to you. I like you.

June 29, 2013

Of Mad Men and Unique-Looking Women: Why Megan Draper Will Succeed

Filed under: MiscellAnnia — Ann @ 3:24 pm

Megan Draper Has All the Right Stuff

Do not read this if you have not watched all of “Mad Men” Season Six – spoilers ensue.

I’ve just finished watching the season finale of “Mad Men.” Among all of the other moves and changes in the air, actress Megan Draper (Jessica Paré) — the “child bride” of our antihero, Don Draper — is poised to move to L.A. to investigate “all these opportunities in Hollywood.” Thinking about the timing of this, and what Hollywood was cranking out in the late 60s and 70s, I predict that the Divine Ms. Megan is going to be a smash hit in tinsel town. Why? Apparently she’s got the acting chops — she’s holding her own on a hit soap opera — and (speaking of chops) I predict that her interesting-looking mouth is going to win her all the grittiest roles. It was right about the late 60s and early 70s that Hollywood started recognizing the value of the imperfect face, and 1970s actresses were notoriously quirky in this regard. Karen Black, who was glorious in the very dark “Nashville” (1975), had a crossed eye. The effect added an authentic note to her strange-girl characters and epitomized the off-set feel of the era.

Karen's Eyes

Films of the 70s were all about the unconventional, the antihero. As one writer put it, “films began to reflect the disenfranchisement brought by the excesses of the past twenty years.” Post-Vietnam, directors of the time were willing to take an unflattering look at America as they had never done before, and their honest look into the face of a country gone mad was reflected in their casting choices. Sure, Catherine Deneuve was still around to reflect mid-century’s infatuation with the perfect, cool, icy blonde, but many of the major award-winning films of the 70s starred actresses who might not have had a chance in an earlier era. In the 1970s, Glenda Jackson was nominated for four Academy Awards and won two. She was mighty in talent, but no classical beauty.

Acting Goddess Glenda

Sally Field, who won every award under the sun for 1979′s “Norma Rae,” was more cute than glamorous (and we saw her sweat on screen!), as was Diane Keaton, who took home all the awards in 1977′s “Annie Hall.”

Guts Not Glamour

Boyish Good Looks

Marsha Mason, another plain powerhouse, was nominated for several Oscars in the 1970s and “Cinderella Liberty” earned her a Best Actress Golden Globes statuette.

No Cinderella She

I predict that Megan Draper — or Megan Calvet, if she wants to see her birth name in lights — is going to be a casting director’s dream as she crosses the threshold into this newer, darker Hollywood. I can see her cast opposite Al Pacino, John Cazale, Steve McQueen, Jack Nicholson, Peter Fonda or any of the other Bad Boys of the time. That is, of course, unless she finds herself competing for roles against Lauren Hutton

We Love Lauren's Gap

or Ali McGraw — two “dentally different” actresses who drew some juicy roles at the time AND garnered admiration for owning their uniqueness.

The Crossed Tooth Was Her Mark of Beauty

1970s Hollywood was all about relentless honesty, and Megan Calvet Draper is going to fit right in. Don Draper, however, should stay in New York.

May 5, 2013

The Art and Risk of Silence and Self-Disclosure

Filed under: Ann the Columnist:Essays — Ann @ 8:25 am

Shhhh.

Listening to Terry Tempest Williams being interviewed last night on NPR’s “To The Best of Our Knowledge,” I was captivated by her discussion of women’s self-silencing. Williams is the author of “When Women Were Birds,” a book built around the fact that when, based on her mother’s death-bed invitation, she went to the family home a month post-funeral to read her mother’s journals (three shelves of cloth-bound books), she discovered that every page was blank.

In Williams’ words:

“You know, when I saw those…journals, I thought, finally I can read what my mother was thinking. And then the first blank, the second blank, the third, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth, all of my mother’s journals blank. It was like a second death and I just stuffed that down into the toes of my boots and just didn’t deal with it. And really…it wasn’t until I was 54, the age my mother was when she died that I brought that story back into consciousness, thinking, OK, why. What was my mother really trying to say to me?”

And later in the interview:

“[My mother] spoke to me but I know there’s so much she never said. I saw the price that my mother paid for remaining silent. I saw the price that my mother paid for her grace and I think as her daughter I was very conscious of my anger. Call it sacred rage. You know, I think in some areas I have found my voice through my anger. I also have to say in the beginning I thought I was writing a book about voice but I think in the end I may have written a book about silence. What do we speak of? What do we withhold? And I think that’s a constant assessment for women because the consequences when we speak out.”

These words hit me hard. I’m a writer. I write at every opportunity. I have kept journals since I was a teen, and this blog for several years. I also post regularly on Facebook, write reviews for Yelp and Amazon, and have even been published (in Woman’s Day, Sierra Life, and various local newspapers). I’m such a compulsive writer that I keep a notepad by my bed (for dreams) and yellow Post-It notes on my living room end table, so that I can scrawl down random thoughts at need. If you opened my seldom-used checkbook, you would find its pages ornamented with scribbles written furiously at stoplights — the checkbook being the only available paper when inspiration hits while driving.

And, in every writing, the urge to censor myself has been keenly felt, whether because of the critical audience in my head, fear of offending, or just plain fear of being seen too clearly, too well. Our culture has long heralded the “strong, silent type.” We all know that familiarity breeds contempt. My own beautiful mother keeps so much of herself TO herself that on the rare occasion when she discloses something personal to me it’s as if she has offered me a rare and fragile gift. I’m almost afraid to take it in for fear of breaking it in my clumsy appreciation. And I have always wanted to be like my mother, but this writing compulsion betrayed me from an early age.

I have long disdained being ruled by fear. Legislation by fear, management by fear, fear-driven decision-making, fear-driven behaviors — nothing good ever comes from letting fear govern our lives. And yet, every time I write something about myself, I feel that twinge of self-doubt: Should I not say that? Will this come back to bite me? Does that seem strange? Is this offensive? Although of course our public voice must be tempered with equal measures of compassion and good judgment, that kind of second-guessing robs writing and life of its rich spontaneity.

Towards the end of her interview, Williams said this:

“I still choose to speak because I think that that which is most personal is most general. And I do have a voice in the world. And if I’m afraid then I know that other people are afraid too.”

Hearing that, I felt something catch in my chest. For a moment I imagined the exhilaration of speaking one’s mind with courage, of writing one’s words without fear followed by deletion. I think, to an extent, we are all afraid to be truly known, to be “found out.” But I also know that — in the words of my dear friend Rachel — when we “unzip and show our souls,” some of the most brilliant and breathtaking connections can be made with others, and I know that true intimacy is born in those moments of knowing one another and being known, fearlessly. It mystifies me that there’s a trade-off. I will never have my mother’s grace and mystery, for my words are everywhere now, my life’s graffiti, sometimes elegant, sometimes not. There exists a written record of this experience I choose to call the quest for self-actualization but in reality is just me, noticing. My mother notices with still and undocumented sureness. I notice in big broad noisy strokes. Like Williams’ mother’s empty journals, these choices are the stories of our lives.

April 20, 2013

Ignorance

Filed under: Rants! — Ann @ 8:19 am

I posted this on Facebook recently, motivated by some irritating (hate-filled) comments I’d recently seen. The quote got quite a few Likes and at least one Share so I thought I’d memorialize it here. It’s a bit more cynical than my usual worldview but, sadly, there is some truth to it.

“Ignorance MUST be bliss….so many people insist on embracing it.”

March 8, 2013

On not being taken seriously.

Filed under: Ann the Columnist:Essays — Ann @ 5:40 pm

Of course, I'm really talking about respect.

“In terms of sheer psychological damage, I think that one of the worst experiences a human being can suffer is not being taken seriously.” – Me, 3/3/13

I wrote and posted that on Facebook the other day because I see evidence of it far too often. I think of women not being taken seriously in business (and science); I’ve talked to therapists in training who are not taken seriously because of their youth; I just read an article by a woman who is frustrated for not not being taken seriously as a farmer; sometimes youngest children in the family are not taken seriously because they’re “the baby”. Or, in some families, all of the children have a hard time being taken seriously by their parents, or it takes a very long time for that to happen.

Gay and lesbian couples not being able to marry is a perfect example of not being taken seriously — “You don’t need to get married, you can just have a commitment ceremony.” Younger classmates in my MA program have been encouraged by professors to pursue a Ph.D. and because that’s not happened to me (although I’m one of the top achievers, academically speaking) I wonder whether my age is a factor in not being taken seriously as a student. Minorities are often not taken seriously in many arenas (jobs, housing). Overweight people, and especially overweight women, have a very hard time being taken seriously — as women, purchasers of stylish clothing, potential mates and even as employees. We often don’t take elderly couples seriously in their relationships, calling their deep love, devotion and sexual attraction “cute” and “adorable” (or, much more damaging, “disgusting”). And only the typically disempowered are called “feisty” when they assert, or attempt to assert, their power.

Also: I know of people who set out to launch careers in the arts who were told they should only minor in the subjects of their passion because they could never get a job doing something as frivolous as art or writing. (What writer does not want to be taken seriously as a writer?) And I’m guessing that serious tattoo artists struggle to get respect for their talents. Women who choose to stay home with their children are not taken seriously as laborers. In our culture, many times people in chronic pain are not taken seriously and are dismissed as “drug addicts.” Those suffering from depression are often told by well-meaning friends and family to just “get over it.”

Anyone who has ever done anything unusual, against the mainstream, “off-time,” or cutting edge has had to struggle with being taken seriously. And some of those people, when expressing how very much they want and need to be taken seriously, are warned not to take themselves too seriously. What is more serious than your essential self, your you-ness, your experience?

If you’ve ever experienced not being taken seriously — as a student, in your profession, as to your dream, as to your sexual orientation, religion, ambitions, as an employee or as a human being, as a patient, client…then you know what I’m talking about. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, consider yourself fortunate.

What I’m really talking about here, of course, are respect and empowerment. Being treated as though everything you are and everything you determine to be are vitally important. I take you seriously, I take your relationship seriously, I take your career seriously, I take your dreams seriously – I TAKE YOUR EXPERIENCE OF YOURSELF AND YOUR WORLD SERIOUSLY: all other ways of saying, I respect you.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress Hosted by Sonic.net